Assessing country performances during the COVID-19 pandemic: a standard deviation based range of value method

  • Serap Pelin Türkoğlu Department of Management and Organization, Ankara Yıldırım Beyazıt University, Ankara, Turkey
  • Sevgi Eda Tuzcu Department of Business Administration, Ankara University, Ankara, Turkey
Keywords: COVID-19 pandemic, ROV method, SDV method, MCDM, middle-high income countries


In this paper, we compare the pandemic management performance of 22 countries that belong to the middle-high income class based on criteria including the pandemic data, population characteristics, and health system capacity. The management of the COVID-19 pandemic requires considering many and often conflicting aspects at the same time which necessitates an MCDM approach. We use a standard deviation (SDV) based range of value (ROV) method which coincides with the black-box nature of the disease. The weights obtained from the SDV method reveal that the number of COVID-19 deaths, current health expenditure, and deaths due to cardiovascular diseases are the most important criteria. The ROV method indicates that most Asian countries are ranked in higher positions due to their strong healthcare systems and quick implementation of social distancing rules. The lowest performances belong to Bulgaria, Montenegro, and Bosnia and Herzegovina. They have experienced an elevated number of deaths due to having an elderly population and inefficient usage of healthcare resources. We also show that extreme poverty is an important determinant of country performance. In countries where poverty is higher, as the case with Indonesia, implementing the social distancing rules becomes almost impossible which affects the overall country performance significantly.


Download data is not yet available.


Adabavazeh, N., Nikbakht, M., & Amirteimoori, A. (2020). Envelopment analysis for global response to novel 2019 coronavirus-SARS-COV-2 (COVID-19). Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management Studies, 7(2), 1–35.

Aydin, N., & Yurdakul, G. (2020). Assessing countries’ performances against COVID-19 via WSIDEA and machine learning algorithms. Applied Soft Computing Journal, 97, 106792.

Bedford, J., Enria, D., Giesecke, J., Heymann, D. L., Ihekweazu, C., Kobinger, G., Lane, H. C., Memish, Z., Oh, M. don, Sall, A. A., Schuchat, A., Ungchusak, K., & Wieler, L. H. (2020). COVID-19: towards controlling of a pandemic. The Lancet, 395(10229), 1015–1018.

De Nardo, P., Gentilotti, E., Mazzaferri, F., Cremonini, E., Hansen, P., Goossens, H., & Tacconelli, E. (2020). Multi-Criteria Decision Analysis to prioritize hospital admission of patients affected by COVID-19 in low-resource settings with hospital-bed shortage. International Journal of Infectious Diseases, 98, 494–500.

Diakoulaki, D., Mavrotas, G., & Papayannakis, L. (1995). Determining objective weights in multiple criteria problems: The critic method. Computers and Operations Research, 22(7), 763–770. DOI:

El-Santawy, M. F., & Ahmed, A. N. (2012). A SDV-MOORA Technique for Solving Multi-Criteria Decision Making Problems with No Preference. Life Science Journal, 9(4), 5881–5883.

George, B., Verschuere, B., Wayenberg, E., & Zaki, B. L. (2020). A Guide to Benchmarking COVID-19 Performance Data. Public Administration Review, 80(4), 696–700.

Ghorabaee, M. K., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS). Informatica (Netherlands), 26(3), 435–451. DOI:

Hajkowicz, S., & Higgins, A. (2008). A comparison of multiple criteria analysis techniques for water resource management. European Journal of Operational Research, 184(1), 255–265. DOI:

Hassan, N., Kamal, Z., Moniruzzaman, A. S., Zulkifli, S., & Yusop, B. (2015). Weighting Methods and their Effects on Multi- Criteria Decision Making Model Outcomes in Water Resources Management.

Issac, A., Radhakrishnan, R. V., Vijay, V., Stephen, S., Krishnan, N., Jacob, J., Jose, S., Azhar, S., & Nair, A. S. (2021). An examination of Thailand’s health care system and strategies during the management of the COVID-19 pandemic. Journal of Global Health, 11(03002), 1–4. DOI:

Jamison, D. T., Lau, L. J., Wu, K. B., & Xiong, Y. (2020). Country performance against COVID-19: Rankings for 35 countries. BMJ Global Health, 5(12).

Jiang, H. (2020). China’s Anti-epidemic Experience and Its World Significance: An Introduction to China’s Fight against the COVID-19 Epidemic: Its Contribution and Implications to the World in the Eyes of Foreigners. International Critical Thought, 10(4), 655–658.

Kayapinar Kaya, S. (2020). Evaluation of the Effect of COVID-19 on Countries’ Sustainable Development Level: A comparative MCDM framework. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 3(3), 101.

Khafaie, M. A., & Rahim, F. (2020). Cross-Country Comparison of Case Fatality Rates of Covid19/Sars-Cov-2. Osong Public Health Research Perspective, 11(2), 74–80.

Khatua, D., De, A., Kar, S., Samanta, E., Sekh, A. A., & Guha, D. (2020). A Fuzzy Dynamic Optimal Model for COVID-19 Epidemic in India Based on Granular Differentiability. In SSRN Electronic Journal.

Madić, M., Radovanović, M., & Manić, M. (2016). Application of the ROV method for the selection of cutting fluids. Decision Science Letters, 5(2), 245–254. DOI:

Majumder, S., Kar, S., & Samanta, E. (2020). A fuzzy rough hybrid decision making technique for identifying the infected population of COVID-19. Soft Computing.

Md Hamzah, N., Yu, M. M., & See, K. F. (2021). Assessing the efficiency of Malaysia health system in COVID-19 prevention and treatment response. Health Care Management Science, 24(2), 273–285.

Mimovic, P., Tadic, D., Borota-Tisma, A., Nestic, S., & Lafuente, J. G. (2021). Evaluation and ranking of insurance companies by combining TOPSIS and the interval fuzzy rough sets. Serbian Journal of Management, 16(2).

Mishra, A. R., Rani, P., Krishankumar, R., Ravichandran, K. S., & Kar, S. (2021). An extended fuzzy decision-making framework using hesitant fuzzy sets for the drug selection to treat the mild symptoms of Coronavirus Disease 2019 (COVID-19). Applied Soft Computing, 103, 107155.

Olivia, S., Gibson, J., & Nasrudin, R. (2020). Indonesia in the Time of Covid-19. Bulletin of Indonesian Economic Studies, 56(2), 143–174.

Pal, R., Sekh, A. A., Kar, S., & Prasad, D. K. (2020). Neural network based country wise risk prediction of COVID-19. Applied Sciences (Switzerland), 10(18).

Samanlioglu, F., & Kaya, B. E. (2020). Evaluation of the COVID-19 Pandemic Intervention Strategies with Hesitant F-AHP. Journal of Healthcare Engineering, 2020.

Sayan, M., Sarigul Yildirim, F., Sanlidag, T., Uzun, B., Uzun Ozsahin, D., & Ozsahin, I. (2020). Capacity Evaluation of Diagnostic Tests for COVID-19 Using Multicriteria Decision-Making Techniques. Computational and Mathematical Methods in Medicine, 2020.

Setiati, S., & Azwar, M. K. (2020). COVID-19 and Indonesia. April.

Shirazi, H., Kia, R., & Ghasemi, P. (2020). Ranking of hospitals in the case of COVID-19 outbreak: A new integrated approach using patient satisfaction criteria. International Journal of Healthcare Management, 13(4), 312–324.

Si, A., Das, S., & Kar, S. (2021). Picture fuzzy set-based decision-making approach using Dempster–Shafer theory of evidence and grey relation analysis and its application in COVID-19 medicine selection. Soft Computing, 9(2014).

Yakowitz, D. S., & Szidarovxzky, F. (1993). Multi-attribute Decision Making: Dominance with Respect to an Importance Order of Attributes. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 54, 167–181. DOI:

Yiğit, A. (2020). The Performance of OECD Countries in Combating with Covid 19 Pandemics: A Cross-Sectional Study. Journal of Current Researches on Social Sciences, 10(10 (2)), 399–416.

How to Cite
Türkoğlu, S. P., & Tuzcu, S. E. (2021). Assessing country performances during the COVID-19 pandemic: a standard deviation based range of value method. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications, 4(3), 59-81.