Measuring Sustainability Performance Indicators Using FUCOM-MARCOS Methods

  • Ibrahim Badi Libyan Academy, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Misurata - Libya
  • L. J. Muhammad Mathematics and Computer Science Department, Federal University of Kashere, Gombe- Nigeria
  • Mansir Abubakar Department of Mathematical Sciences, Al-Qalam University, Katsina State – Nigeria
  • Mahmut Bakır Department of Aviation Management, Samsun University, Samsun - Turkey
Keywords: MCDM, MARCOS, FUCOM, Green innovation, performance indicators


Due to rising environmental concerns, green innovation has become a familiar and appealing topic worldwide in recent years. In addition, population growth, globalization, urbanization, and industrialization have given rise to many problems, such as damage to the environment, the economy, and the living conditions of society. This paper aims to evaluate and prioritize aspects of green innovation, taking into account sustainability performance indicators. FUCOM-MARCOS hybrid methods were used. The experimental results of the proposed method showed that management technological innovation (C1) is the most influential part for adopting green practices in the textile industry in Nigeria. The study also showed that greening the supplier (C6) and product technology innovation (C5) are the second and third most important aspects of green innovation. Furthermore, it analyzed the sustainability performance indicators using the MARCOS method. The findings reveal that social performance (SPI-3) was the most sustainable and vital indicator in terms of green innovation practices in the textile sector in Nigeria. Sensitivity analysis was also conducted using five other methods, and the results obtained showed stability in the order of the indicators. 


Download data is not yet available.


Acar, E., Kiliç, M., & Güner, M. (2015). Measurement of sustainability performance in textile industry by using a multi-criteria decision making method. Textile and apparel, 25(1), 3–9.

Alosta, A., Elmansuri, O., & Badi, I. (2021). Resolving a location selection problem by means of an integrated AHP-RAFSI approach. Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 2(1), 135–142. DOI:

Aly, A. H., & Mansour, M. E. (2017). Evaluating the sustainable performance of corporate boards: the balanced scorecard approach. Managerial Auditing Journal, 32(2), 167–195. DOI:

Asadi, S., OmSalameh Pourhashemi, S., Nilashi, M., Abdullah, R., Samad, S., Yadegaridehkordi, E., Aljojo, N., & Razali, N. S. (2020). Investigating influence of green innovation on sustainability performance: A case on Malaysian hotel industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120860.

Badi, I., & Ballem, M. (2018). Supplier selection using the rough BWM-MAIRCA model: A case study in pharmaceutical supplying in Libya. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 1(2), 16–33. DOI:

Badi, I., & Kridish, M. (2020). Landfill site selection using a novel FUCOM-CODAS model: A case study in Libya. Scientific African, 9, e00537.

Badi, I., & Pamucar, D. (2020). Supplier selection for steelmaking company by using combined Grey-MARCOS methods. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 3(2), 37–48. DOI:

Božanic, D., Tešic, D., & Kocic, J. (2019). Multi-criteria fucom -fuzzy mabac model for the selection of location for construction of single-span bailey bridge. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(1), 132–146. DOI:

Cainelli, G., Mazzanti, M., & Montresor, S. (2012). Environmental Innovations, Local Networks and Internationalization. Industry and Innovation, 19(8), 697–734. DOI:

Chen, H., & Wang, L. (2017). Coproducts Generated from Biomass Conversion Processes. In H. Chen & L. Wang (Eds.), Technologies for Biochemical Conversion of Biomass (pp. 219–264). Elsevier Inc. DOI:

del Río, P., Peñasco, C., & Romero-Jordán, D. (2016). What drives eco-innovators? A critical review of the empirical literature based on econometric methods. Journal of Cleaner Production, 112, 2158–2170. DOI:

Durotoye, T. O., Adeyemi, A. A., Omole, D. O., & Onakunle, O. (2018). Impact assessment of wastewater discharge from a textile industry in Lagos, Nigeria. Cogent Engineering, 5(1), 1–11.

Ecer, F., & Pamucar, D. (2022). A novel LOPCOW-DOBI multi-criteria sustainability performance assessment methodology: An application in developing country banking sector. Omega, 102690.

Elkington, J. (1998). Accounting for the Triple Bottom Line. Measuring Business Excellence, 2(3), 18–22. DOI:

Fazlollahtabar, H., Smailbašic, A., & Stevic, Ž. (2019). Fucom method in group decision-making: Selection of forklift in a warehouse. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(1), 49–65. DOI:

Gbolarumi, F. T., Wong, K. Y., & Olohunde, S. T. (2021). Sustainability Assessment in The Textile and Apparel Industry: A Review of Recent Studies. IOP Conference Series: Materials Science and Engineering, 1051(1), 1–16.

Ghorabaee, M. K., Zavadskas, E. K., Olfat, L., & Turskis, Z. (2015). Multi-Criteria Inventory Classification Using a New Method of Evaluation Based on Distance from Average Solution (EDAS). Informatica, 26(3), 435–451. DOI:

Glavič, P., Pintarič, Z. N., & Bogataj, M. (2021). Process design and sustainable development—a european perspective. Processes, 9(1), 1–21.

Goodridge, W. S. (2016). Sensitivity analysis using simple additive weighting method. International Journal of Intelligent Systems and Applications, 8(5), 27–33. DOI:

Gupta, S., & Dhingra, S. (2021). Modeling the key factors influencing the adoption of mobile financial services: an interpretive structural modeling approach. Journal of Financial Services Marketing.

Houck, M., Speaker, P. J., Fleming, A. S., & Riley, R. A. (2012). The balanced scorecard: Sustainable performance assessment for forensic laboratories. Science and Justice, 52(4), 209–216. DOI:

Jakovljevic, V., Zizovic, M., Pamucar, D., Stević, Ž., & Albijanic, M. (2021). Evaluation of human resources in transportation companies using multi-criteria model for ranking alternatives by defining relations between ideal and anti-ideal alternative (Raderia). Mathematics, 9(9), 1–25.

Kaplan, R. S., & Norton, D. P. (1992). The balanced scorecard: measures that drive performance. Harvard Business Review, 70(1), 71–79.

Keshavarz-Ghorabaee, M., Amiri, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2021). Determination of objective weights using a new method based on the removal effects of criteria (MEREC). Symmetry, 13(4).

Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E. K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2016). A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Economic Computation and Economic Cybernetics Studies and Research, 50(3), 25–44.

Lin, H., Zeng, S. X., Ma, H. Y., & Chen, H. Q. (2015). How Political Connections Affect Corporate Environmental Performance: The Mediating Role of Green Subsidies. Human and Ecological Risk Assessment, 21(8), 2192–2212. DOI:

Lu, M. T., Hsu, C. C., Liou, J. J. H., & Lo, H. W. (2018). A hybrid MCDM and sustainability-balanced scorecard model to establish sustainable performance evaluation for international airports. Journal of Air Transport Management, 71, 9–19. DOI:

Mardani, A., Nilashi, M., Zakuan, N., Loganathan, N., Soheilirad, S., Saman, M. Z. M., & Ibrahim, O. (2017). A systematic review and meta-Analysis of SWARA and WASPAS methods: Theory and applications with recent fuzzy developments. Applied Soft Computing, 57, 265–292. DOI:

Muhammad, L. J., Badi, I., Haruna, A. A., & Mohammed, I. A. (2021). Selecting the Best Municipal Solid Waste Management Techniques in Nigeria Using Multi Criteria Decision Making Techniques. Reports in Mechanical Engineering, 2(1), 180–189. DOI:

Owen, R., Brennan, G., & Lyon, F. (2018). Enabling investment for the transition to a low carbon economy: government policy to finance early stage green innovation. Current Opinion in Environmental Sustainability, 31, 137–145. DOI:

Özdağoğlu, A., Keleş, M. K., Altınata, A., & Ulutaş, A. (2021). Combining Different McDm Methods With the Copeland Method: An Investigation on Motorcycle Selection. Journal of Process Management and New Technologies, 9(3–4), 13–27.

Pamucar, D., Badi, I., & Stevic, Z. (2022). An Integrated FUCOM-RAFSI Model for Assessing the Potential of a New Gateway Port in Libya for Some African Landlocked Countries. International Journal for Quality Research, 16(2), 613–624.

Pamučar, D., & Ćirović, G. (2015). The selection of transport and handling resources in logistics centers using Multi-Attributive Border Approximation area Comparison (MABAC). Expert Systems with Applications, 42(6), 3016–3028. DOI:

Pamučar, D., Stević, Ž., & Sremac, S. (2018). A New Model for Determining Weight Coefficients of Criteria in MCDM Models: Full Consistency Method (FUCOM). Symmetry, 10(9), 1–22.

Pamučar, D., Žižović, M., Biswas, S., & Božanić, D. (2021). A New Logarithm Methodology of Additive Weights (LMAW) For Multi-Criteria Decision-Making: Application in Logistics. Facta Universitatis, Series: Mechanical Engineering, 19(3), 361–380.

Peng, W., Yin, Y., Kuang, C., Wen, Z., & Kuang, J. (2021). Spatial spillover effect of green innovation on economic development quality in China: Evidence from a panel data of 270 prefecture-level and above cities. Sustainable Cities and Society, 69, 102863.

Popović, M. (2021). An MCDM Approach for Personnel Selection Using the CoCoSo Method. Journal of Process Management and New Technologies, 9(3–4), 78–88.

Popović, M., Popović, G., & Karabašević, D. (2021). Determination of the importance of evaluation criteria during the process of recruitment and selection of personnel based on the application of the SWARA method. Ekonomika, 67(4), 1–9.

Shujah-ur-Rahman, Chen, S., Saud, S., Bano, S., & Haseeb, A. (2019). The nexus between financial development, globalization, and environmental degradation: Fresh evidence from Central and Eastern European Countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 26(24), 24733–24747.

Simić, J. M., Stević, Ž., Zavadskas, E. K., Bogdanović, V., Subotić, M., & Mardani, A. (2020). A novel critic‐fuzzy fucom‐dea‐fuzzy marcos model for safety evaluation of road sections based on geometric parameters of road. Symmetry, 12(12), 1–27.

Singh, S. K., Giudice, M. Del, Chierici, R., & Graziano, D. (2020). Green innovation and environmental performance: The role of green transformational leadership and green human resource management. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 150, 119762.

Stević, Ž., Pamučar, D., Puška, A., & Chatterjee, P. (2020). Sustainable supplier selection in healthcare industries using a new MCDM method: Measurement of alternatives and ranking according to COmpromise solution (MARCOS). Computers and Industrial Engineering, 140, 106231.

Torkayesh, A. E., & Deveci, M. (2021). A mulTi-noRmalization mUlti-distance aSsessmenT (TRUST) approach for locating a battery swapping station for electric scooters. Sustainable Cities and Society, 74, 103243.

Torkayesh, A. E., Hashemkhani Zolfani, S., Kahvand, M., & Khazaelpour, P. (2021). Landfill location selection for healthcare waste of urban areas using hybrid BWM-grey MARCOS model based on GIS. Sustainable Cities and Society, 67.

Ullah, S., Khan, F. U., & Ahmad, N. (2022). Promoting sustainability through green innovation adoption: a case of manufacturing industry. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(14), 21119–21139.

United Nations. (2020). Goal 13: Take urgent action to combat climate change and its impacts.

Wang, Y., & Yang, Y. (2021). Analyzing the green innovation practices based on sustainability performance indicators: a Chinese manufacturing industry case. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 28(1), 1181–1203.

Wong, C. Y., Wong, C. W. Y., & Boon-itt, S. (2020). Effects of green supply chain integration and green innovation on environmental and cost performance. International Journal of Production Research, 58(15), 4589–4609.

World Trade Organization. (2021). World Trade Statistical Review 2021.

Yazdani, M., Zarate, P., Kazimieras Zavadskas, E., & Turskis, Z. (2019). A combined compromise solution (CoCoSo) method for multi-criteria decision-making problems. Management Decision, 57(9), 2501–2519.

Zakeri, S., Ecer, F., Konstantas, D., & Cheikhrouhou, N. (2021). The vital-immaterial-mediocre multi-criteria decision-making method. Kybernetes. DOI:

Zhang, F., & Zhu, L. (2019). Enhancing corporate sustainable development: Stakeholder pressures, organizational learning, and green innovation. Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(6), 1012–1026.

Žižović, M., & Pamučar, D. (2019). New model for determining criteria weights: Level Based Weight Assessment (LBWA) model. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 2(2). DOI:

Žižović, M., Pamućar, D., Albijanić, M., Chatterjee, P., & Pribićević, I. (2020). Eliminating rank reversal problem using a new multi-attribute model - The RAFSI method. Mathematics, 8(6), 1–16.

How to Cite
Badi, I., L. J. Muhammad, Mansir Abubakar, & Mahmut Bakır. (2022). Measuring Sustainability Performance Indicators Using FUCOM-MARCOS Methods. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications.