Investigation of the Appropriate Data Normalization Method for Combination with Preference Selection Index Method in MCDM

  • Duc Trung Do Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Hanoi University of Industry, Vietnam https://orcid.org/0000-0002-3190-1026
  • Van Dua Tran Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Hanoi University of Industry, Vietnam
  • Van Duc Duong Faculty of Mechanical Engineering, Hanoi University of Industry, Vietnam
  • Nhu-Tung Nguyen HaUI Institute of Technology, Hanoi University of Industry, Vietnam
Keywords: MCDM, PSI, DNM

Abstract

Preference Selection Index (PSI) that is a Multi-Criteria Decision Making Method (MCDM) does not need to determine the weights for criteria and it has been applied in many different fields. However, using only the data normalization method (DNM) proposed by the inventor of the PSI method may narrow the application scope of this method. This study aims to expand the application range of the PSI method by identifying the appropriate DNMs in combination with the PSI method. Twelve different DNMs were used in combination with the PSI method. These twelve combinations were used in turn to solve several problems in different fields. The ranked results of solutions by these combinations were all compared with the results in the published studies. The sensitivity analysis of the ranked results of the solutions in each case also was performed. In this study, four out of twelve DNMs were found to be appropriate in combination with the PSI method. This discovery has extended the application scope of the PSI method that the previous methods have not met.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akyuz, G., & Aka, S. (2015). An Alternative Approach for Manufacturing Performance Measurement: Preference Selection Index (PSI) Method. Business and Economics Research Journal, 6(1), 63-77.

Alrababah, S. A.A., & Atyeh, A.J. (2019). Effect of Normalization Techniques in VIKOR Approach for Mining Product Aspects in Customer Reviews. International Journal of Computer Science and Network Security, 19(12), 112-118.

Arifin, N., & Saputro, P.H. (2022). Selection Index (PSI) Method in Developing a Student Scholarship Decision Support System. International Journal of Computer and Information System, 3(1), 12-16. https://doi.org/10.29040/ijcis.v3i1.55

Attri, R., & Grover, S. (2015). Application of preference selection index method for decision making over the design stage of production system life cycle. Journal of King Saud University-Engineering Sciences, 27(2), 207-216. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2013.06.003 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksues.2013.06.003

Aytekin, A. (2021). Comparative analysis of the normalization techniques in the context of MCDM problems. Decision Making: Applications in Management and Engineering, 4(2), 1-25. https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame210402001a DOI: https://doi.org/10.31181/dmame210402001a

Baghla, S., & Bansal, S. (2014). Effect of normalization techniques in VIKOR method for network selection in heterogeneous networks. 2014 IEEE International Conference on Computational Intelligence and Computing Research, 15435508. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIC.2014.7238357 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1109/ICCIC.2014.7238357

Bozanic, D., Milic, A., Tesic, D., Salabun, W., Pamucar, D. (2021). D numbers–FUCOM–fuzzy RAFSI model for selecting the group of construction machines for enabling mobility. Facta Universitatis. Series: Mechanical Engineering, 19(3), 447-471. http://dx.doi.org/10.22190/FUME210318047B

Budiman, E., Hairah, U., Wati, M., & Haviluddin, H. (2021). Sensitivity analysis of data normalization techniques in social assistance program decision making for online learning. Advances in Science, Technology and Engineering Systems Journal, 6(1), 49-56. https://doi.org/10.25046/aj060106

Stanujkic, D., Djordjevic, B., & Djordjevic, M. (2013). Comparative analysis of some prominent MCDM methods: A case of ranking Serbian banks. Serbian journal of management, 8(2), 213-241. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm8-3774 DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm8-3774

Ersoy, N. (2021). Application of the PIV method in the presence of negative data: an empirical example from a real-world case. Hitit Sosyal Bilimler Dergisi, 14(2), 318-337. https://doi.org/10.17218/hititsbd.974522

Ersoy, N. (2021). Selecting the best normalization technique for ROV method: Towards a real life application. Gazi University Journal of Science, 34(2), 592-609. https://doi.org/10.35378/gujs.767525

Jian, S.Y., Tao, S.J., & Huang, X.R. (2015). Preference selection index method for machine selection in a flexible manufacturing cell. Advanced Materials Research, 1078, 290-293. https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1078.290 DOI: https://doi.org/10.4028/www.scientific.net/AMR.1078.290

Kaplinski, O., & Tamosaitiene, J. (2015). Analysis of normalization methods influencing results: a review to honour Professor Friedel Peldschus on the occasion of his 75th birthday. Procedia Engineering, 122, 2-10. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.001 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2015.10.001

Keshavarz Ghorabaee, M., Zavadskas, E.K., Turskis, Z., & Antucheviciene, J. (2016). A new combinative distance-based assessment (CODAS) method for multi-criteria decision-making. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, 50(3), 25-44.

Maniya, K., & Bhatt, M.G. (2010). A selection of material using a novel type decision-making method: Preference selection index method. Materials & Design, 31(4), 1785-1789. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.020 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.matdes.2009.11.020

Martin, N. (2021). Plithogenic SWARA-TOPSIS Decision Making on Food Processing Methods with Different Normalization Techniques. Advances in Decision Making. https://doi.org/10.5772/intechopen.100548

Mathew, M., Sahu, S., & Upadhyay, A.K. (2017). Effect of normalization techniques in robot selection using weighted aggregated sum product assessment. International Journal of Innovative Research and Advanced Studies, 4(2), 59-63.

Mhlanga, S.T., & Lall, M. (2022). Influence of Normalization Techniques on Multi-criteria Decision-making Methods. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 2224, 012076. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/2224/1/012076

Mic, P., & Antmen, Z.F. (2021). A Decision-Making Model Based on TOPSIS, WASPAS, and MULTIMOORA Methods for University Location Selection Problem. SAGE Open, 11(3). https://doi.org/10.1177/21582440211040115

Opricovic, S., & Tzeng, G.H. (2004). Compromise solution by MCDM methods: A comparative analysis of VIKOR and TOPSIS. European journal of operational research, 156(2), 445-455. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0377-2217(03)00020-1

Phan, N.H., Vu, N.N., Shirguppikar, S., Ly, N.T., Tam, N.C., & Tai, B.T. (2022). Multi-criteria decision making in electrical discharge machining with nickel coated aluminium electrode for titanium alloy using preferential selection index. Manufacturing Review, 9, 13. https://doi.org/10.1051/mfreview/2022010

Prasad, R. V., Rao, C. M., & Raju, B. N. (2018). Application of preference selection index (PSI) method for the optimization of turning process parameters. International journal of modern trends in engineering and research, 5(5), 140-144. https://doi.org/10.21884/IJMTER.2018.5152.IISGD DOI: https://doi.org/10.21884/IJMTER.2018.5152.IISGD

Sahir, S.H., Afriani, J., Ginting, G., Fachri, B., Siregar, D., Simbolon, R., Simarmata, J. (2018). The Preference Selection Index method in determining the location of used laptop marketing. International Journal of Engineering and Technology, 7(3.4), 260-263.

Sanjib, B., & Dragan, B. (2021). Combinative distance based assessment (CODAS) framework using logarithmic normalization for multi-criteria decision making. Serbian Journal of Management, 16(2), 321-340. https://doi.org/10.5937/sjm16-27758

Sari, E.B. (2019). Measuring The performances of the machines via Preference Selection Index (PSI) method and comparing them with values of Overall Equipment Efficiency (OEE). Izmir journal of economics, 34(4), 573-581. https://doi.org/10.24988/ije.2019344859

Sari, E.B. (2020). Recovery alternatives decision by using fuzzy based preference selection index method. LogForum, 16(1), 171-181. https://doi.org/10.17270/J.LOG.2020.386

Sarraf, R., & McGuire, M. P. (2021). Effect of Normalization on TOPSIS and Fuzzy TOPSIS. In Proceedings of the Conference on Information Systems Applied Research, 14(5551), 1-11.

Sianturi, L.T., Mesran, M., Purba, E., & Rahim, R. (2020). Implementation of Preference Selection Index Method In Determination of People’s Business Credit Receiver. Proceedings of the Third Workshop on Multidisciplinary and Its Applications. https://doi.org/10.4108/eai.11-12-2019.2290817

Souissi, M., & Hafdhi, S. (2021). On ranking by using weighted self-normalizing distance metrics in multi-attribute decision-making. Decision Science Letters, 10, 463-470. https://doi.org/10.5267/j.dsl.2021.7.003

Stanujkic, M., Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D., Sava, C., & Popovic, G. (2020). Comparison Of Tourism Potentials Using Preference Selection Index Method. QUAESTUS multidisciplinary research journal, 16, 177-187.

Tien, D.H., Trung, D.D., Thien, N.V., & Nguyen, N.T. (2021). Multi-objective optimization of the cylindrical grinding process of scm440 steel using preference selection index method. Journal of Machine Engineering, 21(3), 110-123. https://doi.org/10.36897/jme/141607

Trung, D.D. (2022). Comparison R and CURLI methods for multi-criteria decision making. Advanced Engineering Letters, 1(2), 46-56. https://doi.org/10.46793/adeletters.2022.1.2.3

Trung, D.D. (2022). Expanding data normalization method to CODAS method for multi-criteria decision making. Applied Engineering Letters, 7(2), 54-66. https://doi.org/10.18485/aeletters.2022.7.2.2

Tus, A., & Adalı, E. A. (2018). Personnel assessment with CODAS and PSI methods. Alphanumeric Journal, 6(2), 243-256. http://dx.doi.org/10.17093/alphanumeric.432843

Vafaei, N., Ribeiro, R. A., & Camarinha-Matos, L. M. (2016). Normalization techniques for multi-criteria decision making: analytical hierarchy process case study. Doctoral conference on computing, electrical and industrial systems, 140, 261-269. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31165-4_26 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31165-4_26

Vafaei, N., Ribeiro, R.A., & Camarinha-Matos, L.M. (2018). Data normalisation techniques in decision making: case study with TOPSIS method. International journal of information and decision sciences, 10(1), 19-38. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIDS.2018.090667 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1504/IJIDS.2018.090667

Vafaei, N., Ribeiro, R.A., & Camarinha-Matos, L.M. (2021). Assessing Normalization Techniques for TOPSIS Method. Technological Innovation for Applied AI Systems. DoCEIS 2021. IFIP Advances in Information and Communication Technology, 626, 132-141. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-78288-7_13

Vafaei, N., Ribeiro, R.A., & Camarinha-Matos, L.M. (2022). Assessing Normalization Techniques for Simple Additive Weighting Method. Procedia Computer Science, 199, 1229-1236. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.156

Yadav, R. (2022). Fabrication, characterization, and optimization selection of ceramic particulate reinforced dental restorative composite materials. Polymers and Polymer Composites, 30, 1-10. https://doi.org/10.1177/09673911211062755

Yadav, S., Pathak, V. K., & Gangwar, S. (2019). A novel hybrid TOPSIS-PSI approach for material selection in marine applications. Sādhanā, 44, 58. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12046-018-1020-x

Yazdani, M., Jahan, A., & Kazimieras Zavadskas, E.K. (2017). Analysis in material selection: Influence of normalization tools on COPRAS-G. Economic Computation & Economic Cybernetics Studies & Research, 51(1), 59-74. https://EconPapers.repec.org/RePEc:cys:ecocyb:v:50:y:2017:i:1:p:59-74

Zavadskas, E. K., Stanujkic, D., Karabasevic, D., & Turskis, Z. (2022). Analysis of the Simple WISP Method Results Using Different Normalization Procedures. Studies in informatics and control, 31(1), 5-12. https://doi.org/10.24846/v31i1y202201

Zolfani, S., Yazdani, M., Pamucar, D., & Zarate, P. (2020). A VIKOR and TOPSIS focused reanalysis of the MADM methods based on logarithmic normalization. Facta Universitatis: Mechanical Engineering, 18(3), 341 – 355. https://doi.org/10.48550/arXiv.2006.08150

Zopounidis, C., & Doumpos, M. (2017). Multiple Criteria Decision Making - Applications in Management and Engineering. Springer. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39292-9 DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-39292-9

Published
2022-10-11
How to Cite
Do, D. T., Tran, V. D., Duong, V. D., & Nguyen, N.-T. (2022). Investigation of the Appropriate Data Normalization Method for Combination with Preference Selection Index Method in MCDM. Operational Research in Engineering Sciences: Theory and Applications. https://doi.org/10.31181/oresta101122091d
Section
Articles